Meraz-Lopez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the presence of scattered items in the front of the car does not provide reasonable suspicion
• holding that the presence of scattered items in the front of the car does not provide reasonable suspicion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2010-01-13· cited 13×
• Enriquez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2006-12-06· cited 4×
• Hinojosa v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2008-10-29· cited 3×
• Jason R. Searcy, as Trustee of the Exempt Assets Trust v. Parex Resources, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2016-06-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Arvizu
  Supreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 3,936×
• Laime v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-12-06· cited 96×
• Stone v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-04-16· cited 84×
• Sims v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-04-01· cited 81×
• Norris v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-07-15· cited 58×
• Lilley v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-05-26· cited 27×
• Burks v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-06-09· cited 26×
• Simmons v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-09-17· cited 8×