Menzel v. List

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Demand upon, and refusal of, the person in possession of the chattel to return it being the essential elements of a cause of action in replevin”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gerda Dorothea Deweerth v. Edith Marks Baldinger, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, Wildenstein & Co., Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant
  Second Circuit· 1994-10-27· cited 180×
• Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus and the Republic of Cyprus v. Goldberg and Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., and Peg Goldberg
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-11-21· cited 63×
• Peters v. Sotheby's Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-09-14· cited 37×
• Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. Elicofon
  E.D. New York· 1981-06-15· cited 35×
• Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation v. Lubell
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-01-25· cited 34×
• Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. Elicofon
  Second Circuit· 1982-05-05· cited 17×
• Frigi-Griffin, Inc. v. Leeds
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1976-05-18· cited 17×
• Republic of Turkey v. Metropolitan Museum of Art
  S.D. New York· 1990-07-16· cited 6×
• Westminister Properties, Ltd. v. Kass
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-02-01· cited 6×
• Stroganoff-Scherbatoff v. Weldon
  S.D. New York· 1976-05-18· cited 4×
• Lawrence v. Meloni
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-07-13· cited 4×
• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 1987-12-30· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Moore v. Maddock
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1928-11-09· cited 4×