Skip to main content
· 3/27/2008

Menz v. Procter & Gamble Health Care Plan

Citations

  • 520 F.3d 865
  • 43 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 3006
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6289
  • 2008 WL 795112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a procedural irregularity exists where the plan administrator, in the exercise of its power, failed to use sound judgment in reaching its decision
  • finding arguments not raised before the district court are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colloton, Shepherd, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.