· 3/27/2008
Menz v. Procter & Gamble Health Care Plan
Citations
- 520 F.3d 865
- 43 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 3006
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6289
- 2008 WL 795112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a procedural irregularity exists where the plan administrator, in the exercise of its power, failed to use sound judgment in reaching its decision
- finding arguments not raised before the district court are waived
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Colloton, Shepherd, Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.