Skip to main content
· 2/29/1904

Mente & Co. v. Le Blanc

Citations

  • 111 La. 970
  • 36 So. 86
  • 1904 La. LEXIS 584

Syllabus

<p>APPEAL—REVIEW.</p> <p>1. This case involves only questions of fact.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although predicated on an NTA that was defective under Pereira , section 1326(d) applied and was not satisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Provosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.