Skip to main content
· 10/22/1931

Mente & Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 24 B.T.A. 401
  • 1931 BTA LEXIS 1644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • citingStricklandv. Washington, 466 U.S. 668,687,104 S. Ct. 2052,80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984)
  • despite incomplete record, sufficient evidence submitted during trial and references during sentencing hearing to expert opinions supporting unpursued defense theory to merit new trial
  • “A criminal defendant is constitutionally entitled to a record of sufficient completeness to permit effective appellate review of his claims.”
  • “A criminal defendant is constitutionally entitled to a record of sufficient completeness to permit effective appellate review of his claims.”
  • “[W]here the affidavits are unable to produce a record which satisfactorily recounts the events material to the issues on appeal, the appellate court must order a new trial.”
  • internal quotation marks 5 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 100622-5 omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aeundell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.