Skip to main content
· 8/21/1981

Menominee Rubber Company v. Gould, Inc.

Citations

  • 657 F.2d 164
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under balance of harms test certain dealership termination would be more destructive than possible competitive injuries
  • under balance of harms test certain dealership termination would be more destructive than possible competitive injuries
  • “The loss of goodwill and the disruption of the dealer’s business resulting from its termination is substantial and sufficient to constitute ‘irreparable harm’.”
  • loss of goodwill and the disruption of a distributor's business resulting from the termination of an agreement was substantial and sufficient to constitute irreparable harm.
  • “The imbalance between the hardship [the distributor] would suffer if terminated [including the loss of good will and disruption of business] versus the hardship [the defendant] would suffer if the status quo were maintained is ... apparent ....”
  • \The imbalance between the hardship [the distributor] would suffer if terminated [including the loss of good will and disruption of business] versus the hardship [the defendant] would suffer if the status quo were maintained is ... apparent ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Pell, Markey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.