Menihan v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting the inquiry to the sufficiency of the evidence when there has been no challenge to the jury instructions
• limiting the inquiry to the sufficiency of the evidence when there has been no challenge to the jury instructions
• requiring a Franks hearing when the defendant makes a preliminary showing that an officer made a false statement in applying for a warrant and the “false statement was necessary to a finding of probable cause”
• “Direct evidence is not required to uphold a jury’s verdict; circumstantial evidence can be sufficient.”
• “Direct evidence is not required to uphold a jury’s verdict; circumstantial evidence can be sufficient.”
• “Direct evidence is not required to uphold a jury’s verdict; circumstantial evidence can be sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).