Skip to main content
· 1/26/1922

Menger v. Inland Empire Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance

Citations

  • 118 Wash. 514
  • 203 P. 934
  • 1922 Wash. LEXIS 650

Syllabus

<p>Insurance (91) — Fire Insurance — Forfeiture of Policy — Change of Title or Interest. A policy of fire insurance is avoided by a sale of the property without the consent of the insurance company, where consent of the company is imposed in the policy as a condition to the continuance of insurance upon a transfer of the property.</p> <p>Same (35, 91) — Contracts (41) — Validity—Public Policy. A contract of fire insurance making it invalid upon a transfer of the property insured, unless the consent of the company be indorsed upon the policy, is not void as against public policy.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statement made by the defendant in an affidavit submitted with motion for a continuance may be admitted as an admission against the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.