Meng Hua Wan v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a petitioner complains of impermissible fact- finding by the BIA, “that claim is unexhausted unless and until the alien files a timely motion asking the BIA to reconsider its actions”
• upholding BIA finding of no due diligence where petitioner attempted to reopen years after being removed despite having received instructions regarding reopening
• denying a petitioner’s motion to rescind an in absentia order due to a wrong zip code on the petitioner’s NTA
• taking the same approach when, even if petitioner had received ineffective assistance, petitioner still didn't take any action regarding his immigration proceedings for more than ten years
• required when raising issues not previously presented to the agency
• required when raising issues not previously presented to the agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).