District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/16/1988
Menendez v. State
Citations
- 521 So. 2d 210
- 1988 WL 13251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that car parked in motel parking lot was within curtilage of motel room
- finding competent substantial evidence that defendant carried or used a firearm during the course of the ongoing offense of cocaine trafficking sufficient to support reclassification pursuant to section 775.087(1
- finding competent substantial evidence that defendant carried or used a firearm during the course of the ongoing offense of cocaine trafficking sufficient to support reclassification pursuant to section 775.087(1
- enhancement under § 775.081(1), Fla.Stat.(1985) permissible where evidence shows defendant had weapon “readily available,” though not in actual “physical possession”
- court found substantial, competent circumstantial evidence that defendant carried or used a firearm at some point in the course of trafficking in cocaine to support enhancement under section 775.087(1
- “Appellant’s trafficking offense, as with many drug possession offenses, was essentially ongoing. Appellant was in violation of the law during the entire time he was in possession.... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joanos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-09-14· cited 72×
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-02· cited 56×
- Connolly, Jr. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-29· cited 23×
- Willingham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-03· cited 15×
- State v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-19· cited 5×
- State v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-02· cited 4×
- Robins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-08· cited 3×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-10-04· cited 2×
- State v. Richard W. Joy, IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-07· cited 1×
- Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-25· cited 1×
- Menendez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-21· cited 1×
- State v. Richard W. Joy, IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-08
- CORNELIUS SHANNON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-07-27
- TREMAINE DRIVER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-01-15
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-30
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 390×
- Jaramillo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-08· cited 90×
- Earnest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-08-31· cited 61×
- Arant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-01-18· cited 42×
- Whitehead v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-15· cited 34×
- Joyner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-10-08· cited 27×
- Buenoano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-29· cited 20×
- Rhoden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-10-23· cited 17×
- Kresbach v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-28· cited 14×
- Bellinger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-11-05· cited 12×
- Buenoano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-04-09· cited 11×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-25· cited 9×
- State v. PerryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-06-19· cited 8×
- Bradley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-05· cited 7×
- Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-01-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.