Mendoza v. Town of Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiff’s discrimination claim under the 28 FEHA because the statutory scheme applies only to employees, not unremunerated 1 workers
• upholding trial court’s dismissal of complaint on demurrer to plaintiffs claim that he was wrongfully terminated in breach of public policy and discrimination in violation of the FEHA was proper because plaintiff was not an employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).