Mendoza v. Sysco Food Services of Arizona, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[U]nder the Ninth Circuit analysis, 2 [surveillance] does not itself qualify as an adverse employment action.”
• “He declares that he obtained relief only after he went to Sysco’s Human Resources Center with his union steward and complained. Plaintiff does not explain exactly what relief he obtained.”
• plaintiff’s claims based on Title VII not preempted by section 301 because the action did not arise from the CBA but out of protection of Title VII against discrimination based on national origin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).