Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurisdiction vests in the immigration court when a Pereira violation is cured
• noting that for prison conditions to constitute torture, they must be “extreme” and, like torture itself under § 208.18(a)(5
• “[N]othing requires that we convert judicial review of agency action into a ping- pong game and remand is not required when it would be an idle and useless formality.” (internal quotation marks, brackets, and ellipsis omitted)
• holding the same regarding Pereira
• \The Attorney General has promulgated regulations governing removal proceedings that do address when jurisdiction vests in the Immigration Court.\
• the INA \does not ... explain when or how jurisdiction vests\ in immigration courts (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).