· 7/7/2009
Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.
Citations
- 213 P.3d 288
- 222 Ariz. 139
- 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Applying Lee to the facts of this case . . . ”
- “[B]ad faith claim constituted a completely independent tort cause of action and □□ was, thus, not within the purview of the [workers’ compensation] exclusivity provision.”
- “A bad faith claim by an injured employee against his or her employer’s workers’ compensation carrier is considered a first-party claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norris, Johnsen, Winthrop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.