Mendoza v. Drug Enforcement Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a source who provided information pertaining to the requester’s methamphetamine trafficking activities did so under an implied assurance of confidentiality
• concluding that a source 20 who provided information pertaining to the requester’s methamphetamine trafficking activities did so under an implied assurance of confidentiality
• concluding that a source who provided information pertaining to the requester’s methamphetamine trafficking activities did so under an implied assurance of confidentiality
• finding that “there is not a public interest sufficient to override the agency's appropriate interest in maintaining the secrecy of . . . internal procedures” regarding violator identifiers
• finding that “there is not a public interest sufficient to override the agency's appropriate interest in maintaining the secrecy of . . . internal procedures” regarding violator identifiers
• approving the withholding of DEA “ ‘violator identifiers’ called G-DEP codes, NADDIS numbers, and confidential informant codes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).