Mendez v. Robertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[n]either [Rule 7.2(a)] nor [A.R.S. § 13-3967(B
• accepting special action jurisdiction of denial of motion to reexamine conditions of release, including amount of bail
• stating defendant had no adequate remedy on appeal from interlocutory order
• no right to evidentiary hearing on defendant’s request to modify conditions of release
• because defendant requesting reexamination of pretrial release conditions was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing, defendant did not have right to compel the victim to testify and be subject to cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).