Mendez v. Ortega

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts are bound to take notice of the limits of their authority and if want of jurisdiction appears at any stage of the proceedings, original or appellate, the court should notice the defect and enter an appropriate order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Greene v. Greene
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-05· cited 19×
• Colucci v. Greenfield
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-11· cited 12×
• City of Gainesville v. Republic Inv. Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-06· cited 6×
• Henry's Drive-In, Inc. v. Ideal Rock Products Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-04-24· cited 6×
• Thorney v. Clough
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-11· cited 4×
• State ex rel. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Group v. Taylor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-10-19· cited 1×
• JOHN A. THOMPSON, etc. v. STEPHEN A. THOMPSON, etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-07-06
• Juana Y. Galvez v. CIT Bank
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-26

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bohlinger v. Higginbotham
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1954-03-12· cited 21×
• West 132 Feet v. City of Orlando
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1920-06-15· cited 14×
• Canonico v. Devine
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1961-05-18· cited 7×

Other cases named Mendez v. Ortega

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Mendez v. Ortega
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-08-01