First Circuit· 3/19/1941
Mendez v. Bowie
Citations
- 118 F.2d 435
- 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- By the sale of the property a plaintiff loses his right to an injunction against the defendants. But he is still entitled to damages, if any, for past alleged wrongs connected with the property. (Citations omitted).
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Magruder and Mahoney, Circuit Judges, and Hartigan, District Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bates v. DeversSupreme Court of Virginia· 1974-03-04· cited 226×
- Pereira v. International Basic Economy Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1967-06-26· cited 120×
- John A. Acree v. Air Line Pilots AssociationFifth Circuit· 1968-02-13· cited 86×
- N. W. Whitley, Cross-Appellant v. George W. Seibel, Individually and as a Police Officer of the Chicago Police Department, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1982-03-24· cited 75×
- Harper Plastics, Inc. v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1981-08-24· cited 58×
- Selvia v. ReitmeyerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-05-14· cited 48×
- Rudell v. Comprehensive Accounting Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1986-09-30· cited 39×
- Sandstrom v. LarsenHawaii Supreme Court· 1978-08-23· cited 38×
- Keith Walker, D/B/A Homefinder's v. Providence Journal CompanyFirst Circuit· 1974-03-14· cited 25×
- Mashpee Tribe v. James G. WattFirst Circuit· 1983-05-23· cited 23×
- Richard J. Hilliard v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1965-05-06· cited 21×
- S-W Co. v. John Wight, Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 1978-11-15· cited 18×
- Flota Maritima Browning De Cuba, Sociadad Anonima v. Motor Vessel Ciudad De La HabanaD. Maryland· 1963-07-01· cited 13×
- J. Aron and Co., Inc. v. Service Transp. Co.D. Maryland· 1981-05-11· cited 11×
- Hybert v. Shearson Lehman/American Express Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1988-04-12· cited 10×
- Aluminum Extrusion Company v. Soule Steel CompanyC.D. California· 1966-10-27· cited 9×
- Black Voters v. McDonoughD. Massachusetts· 1976-10-06· cited 8×
- Ley v. Boron Oil Co.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-08-15· cited 8×
- Studebaker Corporation v. Allied Products CorporationW.D. Michigan· 1966-05-21· cited 8×
- Roach v. Teamsters Loc. U. No. 688E.D. Missouri· 1978-07-27· cited 7×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court· 1877-04-16· cited 2,216×
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 618×
- Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1895-04-22· cited 174×
- Pappenheim v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1891-10-13· cited 105×
- United States v. Pan-American Petroleum Co.Ninth Circuit· 1932-02-05· cited 39×
- Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. LemanFirst Circuit· 1926-07-02· cited 14×
- Dennison v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-11-29· cited 7×
- Stokes v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1900-01-15· cited 6×
- Doak v. HamiltonFourth Circuit· 1926-11-19· cited 5×
- Southern Oregon Co. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1917-02-13· cited 4×
- Mendez v. Eastern Sugar AssociatesFirst Circuit· 1937-04-08· cited 3×
- Mendez v. BaetjerFirst Circuit· 1939-08-02· cited 3×
- Welde v. New York & Harlem RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1905-11-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.