Skip to main content
· 2/3/1932

Méndez Ríos v. Piñero Rodríguez

Citations

  • 43 P.R. 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even when the error affects an essential element, in order for it to nullify the contract it must be excusable and an error is inexcusable if ignorance as to the real state of affairs is due to negligence attributable to the party that seeks to invoke the doctrine of error.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.