New Mexico Supreme Court· 6/27/1956
Mendenhall v. Vandeventer
Citations
- 299 P.2d 457
- 61 N.M. 277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- to avoid potential prejudice resulting from trial of distinct factual issues, separate trial should be held
- to avoid potential prejudice resulting from trial of distinct factual issues, separate trial should be held
- bifurcation of issues is appropriate if resolution of particular issue may expedite or end the litigation
- bifurcation of issues is appropriate if resolution of particular issue may expedite or end the litigation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lujan, Compton, Sadler, McGhee, Kiicer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hakkila v. HakkilaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-03-21· cited 46×
- Herrera v. C & R PAVING COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1963-11-25· cited 37×
- Hendren v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-11-01· cited 34×
- State Ex Rel. State Highway & Transportation Department v. GarleyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-01-24· cited 33×
- Durham v. Gulf Interstate Engineering CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 29×
- Smith v. LoosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1967-07-21· cited 22×
- Baca v. Swift & CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 19×
- Baum v. OroscoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-07-16· cited 17×
- Woods v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1965-12-06· cited 17×
- Linton v. Mauer-Neuer Meat PackersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1963-01-21· cited 16×
- Gladys A. Bennie, Individually v. Kenneth Pastor and Marilyn Pastor, His WifeTenth Circuit· 1968-04-08· cited 14×
- Scott v. WoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-11-25· cited 14×
- Mitschelen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-09-14· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-05-11· cited 14×
- McCrary v. Bill McCarty Const. Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-02-06· cited 13×
- El Paso Electric v. Real Estate Mart, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-06-08· cited 13×
- Quintana v. Motel 6, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-12-18· cited 11×
- Hoopes v. LambArizona Supreme Court· 1967-06-21· cited 10×
- Trotter v. CallensNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-02-03· cited 6×
- Bolton v. BD. OF CO. COM'RS, VALENCIA CO.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-12-15· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxEighth Circuit· 1902-07-14· cited 75×
- Bowie v. SorrellFourth Circuit· 1953-12-26· cited 54×
- Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-01-10· cited 54×
- Tocci v. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1941-04-05· cited 33×
- Bedser v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1941-08-26· cited 22×
- Larsen v. PowellD. Colorado· 1954-11-16· cited 17×
- Kiloski v. Pennsylvania R.D. Delaware· 1952-02-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.