Court of Claims· 3/28/1990

Mendenhall v. United States

Citations

20 Cl. Ct. 78
36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,836
1990 U.S. Claims LEXIS 83
1990 WL 35022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that claim for return of all money paid to government under contract was sufficiently certain
noting that “the CDA simply does not require that this court interpret plaintiffs [claim] letter in a vacuum”
stating that the contractor’s submission of a written claim to the contracting officer pursuant to § 605(a) is one of the jurisdictional prerequisites for suit in the Court of Federal Claims
stating that a contracting officer has a “minimum of 60 days within which to respond to a claim, and, therefore, there can be no ‘deemed’ decision prior to 60 days from the date of the claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andewelt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mendenhall v. United States

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.