Mendenhall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is no significant difference between the terms ‘great bodily harm’ and ‘serious bodily injury.’ Accordingly, the trial court did not err in enhancing the defendant's sentence pursuant to the terms of the statute and the jury's finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mendenhall v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-10-28· cited 71×
• Wooden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-23· cited 14×
• McLeod v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-30· cited 11×
• Sheppard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-22· cited 8×
• Mendenhall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-09· cited 4×
• Boothe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sanders v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-10-26· cited 77×
• Yasin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-25· cited 13×
• Sanders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-04· cited 8×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-06· cited 8×
• Crawford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-01· cited 1×