Mendenhall v. Kingloff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding under the predecessor statute to OCGA § 9-15-3 that a court was not authorized to require a party to advance costs to the auditor and accountant before judgment
• trial court did not abuse its discretion by appointing an auditor because \it is always discretionary with the court in a case involving matters of account to refer it to an auditor\
• trial court did not abuse its discretion by appointing an auditor because “it is always discretionary with the court in a case involving matters of account to refer it to an auditor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).