Mendenhall Enterprises, Inc. v. Currier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding common ownership requirement set forth in 37 § C.F.R. 1.321 to be valid, reasoning that it is “desirable to tie both the termination and the ownership of the two patents together”
• “Precedents are of value for what they decide, not for every sentence they contain.”
• upholding the PTO’s non-alienation requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).