Mendelvitz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “if we were to assume, arguendo, the search was unlawful, [defendant] has no legitimate expectation of privacy or any other personal, proprietary, or possessory interest in the stolen automobile, the violation of which would invoke the exclusionary rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).