Mendelsohn v. University Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the reduction of the plaintiffs teaching responsibilities could plausibly satisfy the adverse employment action element of a retaliation claim
• finding that a “reduction in [plaintiff]’s teaching duties constitute[d] a significant diminishment in plaintiff’s material responsibilities so that he has alleged an adverse employment action” for the purpose of a retaliation claim
• dismissing Title VII claim because “complaint does not contain even a conclu-sory allegation that the plaintiff was qualified for the position”
• dismissing Title VII claim because the “complaint does not contain even a conclusory allegation that the plaintiff was qualified for the position”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).