Skip to main content
· 3/8/1923

Mendel v. Yocum

Citations

  • 124 Wash. 69
  • 213 P. 452
  • 1923 Wash. LEXIS 822

Syllabus

<p>Contracts (12)—Evidence op Agreement—Suppigiency. .Findings that an architect’s contract for plans for buildings did not undertake to limit the cost are sustained where no such assurance was made, because of the owner’s assurances that he could obtain building material at less than usual cost, and his insistence upon expensive changes and additions to the plans.</p>

Judges: Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.