· 5/7/1909
Mendel v. Herling
Citations
- 116 N.Y.S. 661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying rational basis review because “strict scrutiny has been reserved for laws that discriminate among religions” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.