Mendaro v. World Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “facially broad waiver of immunity” in the “World Bank’s Articles of Agreement” did not “waive the Bank’s immunity to employee suits”
• stating that the IBRD is “commonly referred to as World Bank”
• finding “no evidence that the members of the [World] Bank intended to waive the Bank’s immunity to employee [Title VII] suits”
• inferring waiver only insofar as “necessary to enable the [organization] to fulfill its functions”
• inferring waiver only insofar as “necessary to enable the [organization] to fulfill its functions”
• barring suit by a terminated employee asserting a sex harassment and discrimination claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).