Skip to main content
· 7/2/2008

Menchise v. Akerman Senterfitt

Citations

  • 532 F.3d 1146
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13970
  • 2008 WL 2597046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “section 768.79 is substantive law in diversity cases”
  • applying Florida law, and treating documents entitled “offer of judgment” as offers of settlement because “neither offer provided for an entry of judgment”
  • affirming fee award under section 768.79 and rejecting preemption arguments founded on bankruptcy practice or Rule 68
  • Eleventh Circuit taking position that Schapiro does not require a hearing in a bankruptcy case, but noting “a hearing might be necessary if... the court is inclined to deny a motion for attorney’s fees on the basis of a bad faith offer.”
  • 11th Circuit taking position that Schapiro does not require a hearing in a bankruptcy case, but noting “a hearing might be necessary if . . . the court is inclined to deny a motion for attorney’s fees on the basis of a bad faith offer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Pryor, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.