Skip to main content
· 1/10/2006

Menashe v. v. Secret Catalogue, Inc.

Citations

  • 409 F. Supp. 2d 412
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7763
  • 2006 WL 47665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where, as here, the marks and goods are nearly identical, however, the focus in the second step shifts from likelihood of confusion to basic rules of trademark priority to determine use and ownership of the mark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.