Skip to main content
· 4/24/1916

Menasha Paper Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Citations

  • 241 U.S. 55
  • 36 S. Ct. 501
  • 60 L. Ed. 885
  • 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1800

Syllabus

<p>The Hepburn Act of 1906 amending the Act to Regulate Commerce requires railroad companies to provide and furnish transportation to shippers on reasonable request therefor.</p> <p>Where shippers, who are under contract to deliver interstate shipments in carload lots, call upon an interstate carrier for cars, the carrier is bound to furnish them, and the consignee cannot refuse delivery and by notifying the carrier of its intention to do so, relieve itself of demurrage charges according to the published tariff.</p> <p>An interstate carrier cannot, at the request of a consignee who is under contract to receive interstate shipments, declare an embargo on the shipments and refuse to furnish cars for the shippers; and if it temporarily does so and then removes the embargo, the latter act is but a return to its duty under the Act; and failure to notify the consignee of its action does not relieve the latter from liability for de-murrage provided by the published tariff.</p> <p>Published rules relating to tariffs of interstate carriers must have a reasonable construction.</p> <p>The fact that an interstate carrier complied with the request of a consignee having a private siding to deliver daily on its siding only the number of ears that could be coiiveniently handled, although more could be actually placed on such siding, did not in this ease relieve the consignee from demurrage charges specified in the published tariff on cars held by the carrier awaiting the. consignee’s convenience after arrival and readiness to deliver on the siding.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In conducting habeas review, a federal court is limited to deciding whether a conviction violated the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.