Menard v. Univ. Radiation Oncology Assoc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• lamenting that the \orderly use of discovery by [one party] to discover the other party's case came to nothing\ when the other party was allowed \to wait until after trial started to change a key piece of evidence\
• “[I]t is an abuse of discretion to allow a party at trial to change ... the substance of testimony given in pretrial discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).