Memnon v. CLIFFORD CHANCE US, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a plaintiff’s “speculations, generalities, and gut feelings . . . not supported by specific facts, do not allow for an inference of discrimination to be drawn” (quoting Smalls v. Allstate Ins. Co., 396 F. Supp. 2d 364, 371 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2005))
• “[A]s several courts have found, the same-actor inference is permissive, not mandatory, and even if the same individuals made both decisions, the Court would not be compelled to give [defendant] the benefit of the inference at this stage of the litigation, and I don’t.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).