Members of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Revo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a recycling service charge was analogous to a property tax and therefore not subject to challenge as a taking of property
• explaining that decisions from only these courts clearly establish the law for the purposes of qualified immunity
• explaining that decisions from only these courts clearly establish the law for the purposes of qualified immunity
• no actionable claim for unconstitutional municipal policy or failure to train where there has been no constitutional violation
• “A complaint can be long-winded, even prolix, without pleading with particularity. Indeed, such a garrulous style is not an uncommon mask for an absence of detail.”
• “A complaint can be long-winded, even prolix, without pleading with particularity. Indeed, such a garrulous style is not an uncommon mask for an absence of detail The amended complaint here, although long, states little with particularity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).