Melvin v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although the ALJ did not specifically refer to AR 00-1(4)... or explain the precise weight he gave the ALJ’s findings . . . the ALJ did consider the prior ALJ’s findings as part of reviewing the record.”’
• “Although the ALJ did not specifically refer to AR 00-1(4)... or explain the precise weight he gave the ALJ’s findings . . . the ALJ did consider the prior ALJ’s findings as part of reviewing the record.”
• “As an internal guidance tool, HALLEX lacks the force of law.”
• “Although the ALJ did not specifically refer to AR 00–1(4) . . . or explain the precise weight he gave the ALJ’s findings . . . the ALJ did consider the prior ALJ’s findings as part of reviewing the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).