Melvin Jordan v. Waco Transit System, Inc. and RATP DEV USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting railroad's prior statements from legislative audit about nature of agreement
• “Courts should make every effort to reconcile allegedly conflicting statutes and to give effect to the language and intent of both, so long as doing so does not deprive one or the other of its essential meaning.”
• agency considers ban on DDT

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).