Melton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing whether Melton raised the possibility of a valid claim as to “the grounds upon which Melton based his successive application for post-conviction relief”
• addressing whether petitioner raised the possibility of a valid claim as to “the grounds upon which [the petitioner] based his successive [petition] for post-conviction relief”
• addressing whether petitioner raised the possibility of a valid claim as to “the grounds upon which [the petitioner] based his successive [petition] for post-conviction relief”
• noting inquiry focuses on whether appointed counsel is necessary to investigate facts not in the record
• applying I.R.C.P. 61 in a post-conviction case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dale Carter Shackelford v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2016-05-27· cited 9×
• Doe v. Doe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2010-07-06· cited 7×
• Chaput v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2021-03-10· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Oliver
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-10-17· cited 2,738×
• Charboneau v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2004-11-23· cited 356×
• State v. Payne
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2008-12-15· cited 235×
• Workman v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-06-27· cited 61×
• Swader v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-01-25· cited 46×
• Judd v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-07-27· cited 22×
• Swisher v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1996-10-31· cited 12×