Melodi Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of Govenors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that USAGM and its media outlets have a shared interest in maintaining “the highest journalistic credibility” that is owed weight in the Pickering analysis
• explaining that “Congress’s provision of substantive rights and procedural remedies has been a defining feature of the other regulatory schemes that the District of Columbia Circuit has held to preclude Bivens recovery”
• explaining that \Congress's provision of substantive rights and procedural remedies has been a defining feature of the other regulatory schemes that the District of Columbia Circuit has held to preclude Bivens recovery\
• acknowledging availability of constitutional claim against the federal government of discrimination because of ethnicity or national origin
• action against the Broadcasting Board of Governors and its officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).