· 8/21/1991
Melnick Ex Rel. Melnick's Self-Directed Interest in the Office Automation, Inc. v. Seifert (In Re Seifert)
Citations
- 130 B.R. 607
- 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1195
- 1991 WL 163125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Debtor/defendant could have reasonably foreseen the consequences of not defending an action based in part on fraud. It would be undeserved to give debtor/defendant a second bite at the apple when he knowingly chose not to defend himself in the first instance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George L. Proctor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.