Skip to main content

Mellon v. Coffelt

Citations

  • 730 N.E.2d 102
  • 313 Ill. App. 3d 619
  • 246 Ill. Dec. 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, “in the interest of justice,” the court would review a waived argument on appeal from a motion to dismiss
  • holding that, “in the interest of justice,” the court would review a waived argument on appeal from a motion to dismiss
  • addressing issue, forfeiture notwithstanding, in part because the court was able to do so without the aid of appellate argument
  • addressing issue, forfeiture notwithstanding, in part because the court was able to do so without the aid of appellate argument
  • upholding mandatory arbitration fee that “may operate to expedite cases within the court system”
  • upholding an arbitration fee because it benefits the overall administration of justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geiger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.