Skip to main content
· 6/27/1979

Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Joseph

Citations

  • 406 A.2d 1055
  • 267 Pa. Super. 307
  • 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the borrower’s alleged tender of the amount due and owing is “relevant as a defense in the foreclosure action”
  • mortgagor could not assert counterclaims seeking (1) damages for the lender’s refusal to accept tender of the mortgage obligation to cure the default; or (2
  • claims that arose once the mortgage was in default, and were not part of, or incident to, the creation of the mortgage itself, could not be pled as counterclaims
  • claims that arose once the mortgage was in default, and were not part of, or incident to, the creation of the mortgage itself, could not be pled as counterclaims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Der Voort, Spaeth and Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.