Mellema's Adm'r v. Whipple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although [the petitioner] claims the[] Panel comments restricted its evidentiary presentation, the failure to identify any evidence it was restricted from presenting requires rejection of [the petitioner’s] failure to consider challenge.”
• “FAA § 10(a)(3) has been narrowly construed to avoid impinging on the ‘broad discretion’ afforded [to] arbitrators to decide what evidence should be presented, and cases have recognized the broad latitude arbitrators enjoy in conducting hearings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).