Skip to main content
· 8/13/2015

Melissa W. v. Department of Child Safety

Citations

  • 238 Ariz. 115
  • 357 P.3d 150
  • 719 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 38
  • 2015 Ariz. App. LEXIS 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court may draw negative inference based on parent’s failure to testify
  • observing that “drawing a negative inference” from a parent’s failure to testify at a termination trial is “particularly appropriate”
  • observing that “drawing a negative inference” from a parent’s failure to testify at a termination trial is “particularly appropriate”
  • adding that there is “little benefit in adopting an approach that would permit a parent to forgo, without consequence, testifying about his or her ability to parent or about other circumstances relevant to the court’s determination”
  • declining to address an appellant’s arguments that were not supported with citation to relevant authority
  • “A juvenile court’s drawing a negative inference when a parent fails to testify at a severance hearing is particularly appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eckerstrom, Miller, Espinosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.