E.D. New York· 3/31/1998
Meling v. St. Francis College
Citations
- 3 F. Supp. 2d 267
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17547
- 1998 WL 199197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting reinstatement but denying reinstatement with tenure post-verdict where the tenure decision had not yet taken place
- denying prevailing plaintiff’s request to retain jurisdiction over the tenure application, noting personnel changes at the college
- restrictions on ability to walk, sit, 9 and stand for no more than fifteen minutes each were substantially limiting 10 impairments
- declining to offset a damages award following a jury verdict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gleeson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Parada v. Banco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A.Second Circuit· 2014-03-25· cited 129×
- Douglas v. Victor Capital GroupS.D. New York· 1998-10-13· cited 75×
- Powers v. Polygram Holding, Inc.S.D. New York· 1999-04-02· cited 34×
- Coddington v. Adelphi UniversityE.D. New York· 1999-03-29· cited 31×
- Shedlock v. Department of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-12-08· cited 30×
- Micari v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.E.D. New York· 1999-04-26· cited 29×
- Piascyk v. City of New HavenD. Connecticut· 1999-07-14· cited 20×
- Thorn v. BAE Systems Hawaii Shipyards, Inc.D. Hawaii· 2008-11-10· cited 13×
- Shannon v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceS.D. New York· 2001-03-01· cited 11×
- Trobia v. HendersonW.D. New York· 2004-04-26· cited 5×
- Cole v. Uni-Marts, Inc.W.D. New York· 2000-02-16· cited 4×
- Mittl v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-08-28· cited 2×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 3,317×
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court· 1966-10-17· cited 1,655×
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyThird Circuit· 1997-09-26· cited 909×
- Trustees of Boston University v. BrownSupreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 387×
- Donna Heilweil v. Mount Sinai HospitalSecond Circuit· 1994-08-17· cited 319×
- Irene Wernick v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1996-08-06· cited 247×
- Clarke v. FrankSecond Circuit· 1992-04-06· cited 242×
- Marcia R. LIEBERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward v. GANT Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1980-07-17· cited 232×
- Julia Prewitt Brown v. Trustees of Boston UniversityFirst Circuit· 1990-01-24· cited 228×
- Leonard C. McNemar v. The Disney Store, Inc.Third Circuit· 1996-07-31· cited 183×
- Geraldine POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1978-07-13· cited 154×
- Matthew SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFELITE GLASS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1997-10-14· cited 139×
- Anne DAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SOCIETE GENERALE, Defendant-AppellantSecond Circuit· 1997-03-05· cited 110×
- Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc., a Corporation v. Middle States Association of Colleges and Secondardy Schools, Inc., a CorporationSecond Circuit· 1970-12-21· cited 102×
- NationsBank of Texas, N. A. v. Executive Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1995-02-21· cited 101×
- Clyde N. Griffith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1998-03-11· cited 97×
- South African Airways v. Brink's Ltd.Supreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 83×
- Keddie v. Pennsylvania State UniversityM.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-03-11· cited 74×
- Talavera v. School Board of Palm Beach CountyEleventh Circuit· 1997-11-24· cited 65×
- Michael Swanks v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityD.C. Circuit· 1997-06-20· cited 59×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.