· 2/5/1993
Melia v. Dillon Companies, Inc.
Citations
- 846 P.2d 257
- 18 Kan. App. 2d 5
- 1993 Kan. App. LEXIS 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Here, it is uncontested that Melia concealed and failed to pay for merchandise belonging to the store. Consequently, the existence of probable cause in this case is not a jury question.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Rulon, Knudson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.