Skip to main content
· 9/28/2023

Melendez Llinas, Marielys v. Villegas Martinez, Osvaldo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[f]or purposes of 4 U.S.C. § 111, military retirement benefits are to be considered deferred pay for past services”
  • holding that “military retirement benefits are to be considered deferred pay for past services.”
  • holding that “military retirement benefits are to be considered deferred pay for past services.”
  • debating the classification of military retirement benefits as either present or deferred compensation for purposes of Kansas' state income tax scheme
  • describing the Act as \giving the States the option of\ dividing such pay
  • military retirement benefits are to be considered deferred pay for past services for purposes of 4 U.S.C. § 111

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.