· 10/5/1998
Melda Turker v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Citations
- 157 F.3d 453
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 24596
- 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,691
- 1998 WL 681332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is well- established that a plaintiff cannot sue a state agency or any of its employees in their official capacities for monetary damages.”
- “the District Court did not fully comply law on this issue, the efficiency argument would be with Rule 32(c)(1)”
- “It is ... well-established that a federal court cannot entertain a lawsuit against state officials for violations of state law unless the state has waived its immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. Ohio has not waived that immunity.” (internal citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Moore, Cole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.