Skip to main content
· 10/5/1998

Melda Turker v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections

Citations

  • 157 F.3d 453
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 24596
  • 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,691
  • 1998 WL 681332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is well- established that a plaintiff cannot sue a state agency or any of its employees in their official capacities for monetary damages.”
  • “the District Court did not fully comply law on this issue, the efficiency argument would be with Rule 32(c)(1)”
  • “It is ... well-established that a federal court cannot entertain a lawsuit against state officials for violations of state law unless the state has waived its immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. Ohio has not waived that immunity.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Moore, Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.