Skip to main content
· 10/16/2009

Melcher v. City of San Luis

Citations

  • 334 F. App'x 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]n the absence of ‘full payment of all allowed claims, an unsecured nondischargeable claim may not receive interest.’”
  • “[I]n the absence of ‘full payment of all allowed claims, an unsecured nondischargeable claim may not receive interest.’”
  • “[I]n the absence of ‘full payment of all allowed claims, an unsecured nondischargeable claim may not receive interest.’”
  • “[I]n the absence of ‘full payment of all allowed claims, an unsecured nondischargeable claim may not receive interest.’”
  • “[I]n the absence of ‘full payment of all allowed claims, an unsecured nondischargeable claim may not receive interest.’”
  • “This language is plain: in the absence of ‘full payment of all allowed claims,’ an unsecured non-dischargeable claim may not receive interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Thompson, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.