Melbourne Municipal Firefighters Pension Trust Fund v. Paul E. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the reinstated removal order was “final for detention purposes even though it lack[ed] finality for purposes of judicial review of [the petitioner’s] withholding-only claim”
• finding that California petitioner properly exhausted his state 13 remedies by filing two motions in the trial court, a habeas petition in the court of appeal, and a 14 habeas petition in the state supreme court
• detailing factors a court should consider when deciding whether to impose a duty on third parties
• detailing factors a court should consider when deciding whether to impose a duty on third parties
• limitations to “routine tasks and limited interactions with others” adequately accounted for claimant’s concentration and memory limitations related to “demonstrated psychological symptoms”
• not reaching issue of spoliation (citing Nation-Wide Check Corp. v. Forest Hills Distribs., Inc., 692 F.2d 214, 217 (1st Cir. 1982) (Breyer, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).